SAP Those things - Theory -6- How to play SAP to play well

SAP Those things - Theory -6- How to play SAP to play well

You can think of anything that you didn't have any interest in, didn't put any effort into, and you ended up playing it very well, right? nvidia partner I'm afraid not. In this world, if there is no investment in anything, there is harvest, it really means that you are lucky or particularly good luck, such as you were born with a good father, or the first time in life to buy invoices in 5 million. Unfortunately, luck is a thing that can only be met and never sought. Similarly, in the case of enterprise informatization or SAP, it seems that luck is useless. Who will justifiably say that our high level of enterprise informatization is good luck, and really good companies know that it is hard work for them. Therefore, if you want to play SAP well, whether it is a consultant engaged in this industry, or a company that is ready to implement SAP, in a word, whether you are interested in it or not, it is the right way to learn it first.

I think from several levels, how can we play SAP well? SAP Outsourcing From the enterprise perspective, the enterprise level, especially the top decision-making level, needs to pay attention to SAP system. So how can we show this importance? I think it's not just talking about it, or Shouting a few slogans, but the best attention is reflected in actions. In the simplest terms, if we can quantify some assessment data indicators, can we use the data provided by SAP as the standard? And even whether senior leaders often use SAP to obtain the data they need, rather than asking secretaries and assistants to directly provide it? I think this kind of action will make the whole enterprise feel that SAP is important to us and we are actually using it. Even use it every day, and eventually can't live without it; At the department level (middle-level operation level), it is necessary to consider how to better manage the business of the department by using SAP. smart waste management Middle-level leaders should use the system to support the operation of the department's business and constantly put forward new requirements to make the system run more smoothly and better serve the department's business. The personal level (executive level) is the most use of SAP level, is really to use the system to execute specific business, the executive level is focused on the skilled operation, timely and accurate data and upstream and downstream connection, find problems timely feedback, whether it is a process problem or a system problem, should be timely feedback, and constantly optimize the system. The implementation level does not need to consider too much, everyone needs to master their own operations, need to input information to ensure timely and accurate, timely communication between upstream and downstream, timely feedback if there is a problem, do not get stuck, it is good. From the outside of the enterprise, it is mainly the role of product developers (SAP) and implementer (consulting company). In fact, there are not many articles that can be done at the product level. Once we choose SAP, we have actually determined that we accept SAP as a product and make maximum use of SAP's standard functions (I only heard that some Japanese enterprises will buy SAP platform). Instead of using SAP's standard features, it borrows basic features such as SAP's underlying logic and permission design to re-develop a set of functional applications). Next, there is the factor of the implementer, or more precisely the factor of the implementer consultant. In general, the well-known implementers have more experience, but the implementation cost is relatively high, but the more important thing is the quality and level of the implementation consultants themselves (at present, many high-level consultants may not work in large companies, but also hold management positions in some small companies, and some directly do their own consultants), which will directly determine whether the system solution is suitable for the actual business of the enterprise. Even the cost of later system maintenance, it is recommended that senior consultants or senior project managers in the industry interview implementation consultants is a better way. Well, given the importance and active input of the enterprise itself and the strong implementation consultant, I think SAP can play well.

Of course, in the process of project implementation, project management and knowledge transfer will also determine whether SAP plays well. Personally, I would like to emphasize the reserve and transfer of knowledge, that is, the importance of documents. From the beginning to the end of a project, even from the beginning of selection, project managers should do a good job of documentation. This is not only a backup and reference of knowledge, but more importantly, through documents, we can know why we make such choices and decisions, and why we design such processes and schemes. For the enterprise, this actually records a lot of changes due to the project (including processes, organizational structure, personnel, responsibilities, data, etc.), which are very useful for future system optimization. There is also one, it seems that people's memory is not very good, I have always thought that "good memory is not as good as bad pen", and it is always good to write down. Therefore, what documents need to be recorded in the process of the project, setting the content, format, and scope of communication of the documents are quite important, and it is recommended that special people should supervise and manage the documents.

Another is the internal handover system of the enterprise, which needs to take SAP handover as a part. When employees leave the company, they need to be responsible for system handover and knowledge transfer. It is better to set up a supervisor to ensure that new colleagues can apply the system as soon as possible.

A lot of things, really easy to say, it is difficult to do ah, more difficult is the unity of knowledge and action, a positive attitude is to encounter difficulties, not to complain, and strive to solve, even if the final solution can not be solved or not completely solved, there is no regret. If you do not have a clue for the time being, then first find a starting point, do it again, do the process may have a clue, and more and more clear. To play SAP well, it needs the joint efforts of the enterprise and the implementer. Objectively speaking, the enterprise and the implementation method are 64 points, or even 73 points. In short, the enterprise's serious investment and sincere attention are crucial to the project implementation!

SAP Outsourcing process problem

2